is this visual snow or visual snow syndrome, or something else?

2022.01.17 01:01 TwoLanky is this visual snow or visual snow syndrome, or something else?

I get those little colored dots just moving around my vision, not sure if I always had it, gonna ask a doc abt it, since it might be something else. I dont have migraines, rarely have headaches, have some 'normal after images'(the ones that if you look at the sun or at the light, it will appear for some seconds in your vision. I don't know what is light sensitivity, since I go out and almost every part of my day is outside The floaters arent much, like, 2 or 3, asked my friends about it, and everyone have it. What I have is just that I see some colours moving around and sometimes forming shapes. Idk if I have VSS, or just VS, or those colours can be something happening in my eyes. I do see colors when my eyes are closed, though those are relatively common Yes, I have a somewhat bad night vision, like, it is hard to play football or something else at night. I know seeing those dots at night is normal, I don't remember having it since I havent noticed it since yesterday. Guess it could go away with time. If I go to a doctor, would he be able to fix this? If I ignore it, is it going to go away? I should stop searching those things and jist live since I haven't noticed it in 15y
submitted by TwoLanky to Ophthalmology [link] [comments]

2022.01.17 01:01 vtachytach Physiology question about re-entry tachycardias

Something I have always struggled to understand with the initiation of reentry (particularly for AVNRT) is that the slow pathway has a shorter refractory period. What is it about the pathway makes it have a shorter refractory period? or is there something about the slow conduction that makes it so?

Thanks meddit!
submitted by vtachytach to Cardiology [link] [comments]

2022.01.17 01:01 -la-la- What cultural phenomena/entity/place/etc. are you afraid of and why?

submitted by -la-la- to ParanormalReddit [link] [comments]

2022.01.17 01:01 djklown1 Trap deck- What should i do to make this better

Trap deck- What should i do to make this better submitted by djklown1 to DuelLinks [link] [comments]

2022.01.17 01:01 OkWeather2233 Anyone else?

Anyone else? submitted by OkWeather2233 to dankmemes [link] [comments]

2022.01.17 01:01 JubBird So Terry is missing from my lineup

There's no way that I accidently sold him? Wouldn't they make that abudantlty clear? If I really sold him for 1k because of buttons mashing, then I am done for ever. (If I did accidently sell him for 1k to the computer, is there anyway I can get himm back?)
submitted by JubBird to MyTeam [link] [comments]

2022.01.17 01:01 Johnny_Mohawk Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot by Me. The Great Chicago Ring of Fire

Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot by Me. The Great Chicago Ring of Fire submitted by Johnny_Mohawk to DigitalArt [link] [comments]

2022.01.17 01:01 Best-String7776 Can finances cause divorce?

Married for 4 years I’m 26 and he’s 30. Now we both have daughters from previous relationships. He attended collage and got an AA in machining . While I worked and tried to take care of bills. I work at a mini mart at 15$ an hour. And he gets paid 18$ an hour plus over time. Recently we had agreed that with his income we’d be saving to have a down payment to a home . He had saved up too 16,000$ in just 6 months. Now finances have always been 50/50 on rent then we’d pay our own bills . Sounds horrible . I’ve tried to change it many times and it fails every time . He recently has been introduced to crypto currency and he dumps all of our savings into a token . Doesn’t tell me for a week until I asked how much he had already invested . We get in huge argument and I was close to leaving . My problem here is that he never consults with me before he makes any big purchase. He has done this before with car projects. But this was huge because we had a plan with that money. Now he agreed that he was going to discuss everything with me from now on before he even considers it . Now we got hit with COVID at the start of 2022 I was down for about 8 days and so was he , so we’re not going to be financially stabled for about a month or two . Now he just recently decided to put 1000$ in etherium with out consulting it with me . His response for that is he has no bills to pay. I have gotten my hours cut. I went from 40 hrs a week to 32 hrs. He being my husband should try and help me with even one bill. I’ve had it honestly . I’m so frustrated, any advice would be greatly appreciated.
submitted by Best-String7776 to relationship_advice [link] [comments]

2022.01.17 01:01 smartybrome Free Ubuntu Tutorial - The Ubuntu Linux Desktop User Guide

Free Ubuntu Tutorial - The Ubuntu Linux Desktop User Guide submitted by smartybrome to udemyfreebies [link] [comments]

2022.01.17 01:01 may2118 Dating apps and hookup!

Do any of the dating app work in Regina? I mean i have used Tinder and Match but no luck, is Regina that prudish?
submitted by may2118 to reginansfw [link] [comments]

2022.01.17 01:01 PoetJustice POV: /r/NBA is being created

POV: /NBA is being created submitted by PoetJustice to nbacirclejerk [link] [comments]

2022.01.17 01:01 troymccas1 Where to buy good tequila?

Where’s the best place in to buy high end sipping tequila like Clase Azul Reposado or better?
submitted by troymccas1 to tijuana [link] [comments]

2022.01.17 01:01 plantgrogu Styolite - How can I remove surrounding rock to expose styolite? Is acetic acid safe for this?

Styolite - How can I remove surrounding rock to expose styolite? Is acetic acid safe for this? submitted by plantgrogu to geology [link] [comments]

2022.01.17 01:01 yummybanchan Jeongyeon

Jeongyeon submitted by yummybanchan to 3mix [link] [comments]

2022.01.17 01:01 DealsCanada AmazonCommercial Advanced Strength Duct Tape, 1.88-inch by 45-Yard, Silver, 3-Pack $17.35

Link: Retailer:
AmazonCommercial Advanced Strength Duct Tape, 1.88-inch by 45-Yard, Silver, 3-Pack
Good reviews. Seems like a good price for 3 rolls

submitted by DealsCanada to ShopCanada [link] [comments]

2022.01.17 01:01 ReleaseAKraken Do I need a primer?

We’re repainting the house and I’ve got some questions about primer.
The walls to be repainted include colors such as dark blue, bubble gum pink, and a lilac kind of purple.
The colors we intend to switch to are Neutral grays, a bluish gray (hardly any blue), and a lighter green.
(SW7016, SW6190, SW6234).
Anyway, to get to the point, the question is whether or not I actually need to prime the walls in question before I switch to these colors.
submitted by ReleaseAKraken to HomeImprovement [link] [comments]

2022.01.17 01:01 smartybrome AZ-500: Microsoft Azure Security Technologies-Practice tests

AZ-500: Microsoft Azure Security Technologies-Practice tests submitted by smartybrome to udemyfreebies [link] [comments]

2022.01.17 01:01 LordBroccoli69 (Rushed) Drew this so I would remember what it looked like so I can make an edit

(Rushed) Drew this so I would remember what it looked like so I can make an edit submitted by LordBroccoli69 to surrealism [link] [comments]

2022.01.17 01:01 basillymeow Eaton Canyon Falls, a week ago.

Eaton Canyon Falls, a week ago. submitted by basillymeow to socalhiking [link] [comments]

2022.01.17 01:01 Djpowerline Stop playin’

Stop playin’ submitted by Djpowerline to memes [link] [comments]

2022.01.17 01:01 thinkingstranger January 14, 2022
Yesterday, by a vote of 6 to 3, the Supreme Court struck down the Biden administration’s requirement that businesses with more than 100 employees address the coronavirus pandemic by making employees either get vaccines or, if they choose not to be vaccinated, to test weekly and wear a mask at work. Employees who work exclusively at home or mostly outside were exempted from the requirement, as were those with a religious exemption.
President Joe Biden took office vowing to get the coronavirus pandemic under control. By April 2021, his administration’s efforts to make vaccines available and get them into people’s arms were so successful that in early May he vowed to reach a 70% vaccination rate among those then eligible for the vaccine by July 4. Promptly, political opponents began to undermine confidence in the vaccine, and vaccination rates fell off dramatically.
In July, the administration tried to encourage vaccinations by requiring vaccines or testing for federal workers and for those contracting with the federal government. In November, the administration expanded those requirements with a new one under the authority of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), established in the Department of Labor under Republican President Richard M. Nixon in 1970 to “assure safe and healthy working conditions for working men and women by setting and enforcing standards and by providing training, outreach, education and assistance.” OSHA announced a vaccine or testing requirement for businesses with more than 100 employees.
The mandate would have covered about 84.2 million Americans (our population is about 332 million). OSHA estimated (before Omicron) that the rule would save 6,500 lives and prevent 250,000 hospitalizations over a six-month period.
Employers claimed that the mandate would cost billions of dollars to implement and hundreds of thousands of employees would quit (although the actual numbers of those quitting their jobs over vaccine mandates turned out to be significantly lower than threatened). A number of Republican-dominated state legislatures, including those of Arkansas, Florida, Iowa, Kansas, and Tennessee, fought the mandate by extending unemployment benefits to those fired for refusing to get the vaccine.
Those objecting to the mandate got the extremely conservative U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which covers Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas and which Trump skewed even more extremely to the right, to stop it.
The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, also right-leaning but less extreme, lifted the stay, permitting the rule to go into effect. Now, in a case titled National Federation of Independent Business v. Department of Labor, the Supreme Court has restored the stay.
The six justices in the majority ruled that OSHA did not have the authority to require vaccinations or masks and testing because the coronavirus is not specific to the workplace. OSHA’s responsibility is only to make sure that conditions related to the workplace are safe; it cannot regulate a workplace for a virus that is everywhere, even if people catch it at work.
The three justices who dissented, Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan, seemed incredulous:
“COVID-19 poses grave dangers to the citizens of this country—and particularly, to its workers,” they wrote. “The disease has by now killed almost 1 million Americans and hospitalized almost 4 million. It spreads by person-to-person contact in confined indoor spaces, so causes harm in nearly all workplace environments. And in those environments, more than any others, individuals have little control, and therefore little capacity to mitigate risk. COVID-19, in short, is a menace in work settings. The proof is all around us: Since the disease’s onset, most Americans have seen their workplaces transformed. So the administrative agency charged with ensuring health and safety in workplaces did what Congress commanded it to: It took action to address COVID-19’s continuing threat in those spaces.”
At stake in the case is not only many thousands of American lives and restoring the stability of society, but also the same issue at the heart of our current struggle over voting rights: the relationship of the federal government to the states.
Justices Neil Gorsuch, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito began their decision opposing the mandate by saying, “The central question we face today is: Who decides?” Can a federal agency charged with workplace safety mandate vaccines, or should the work of combating coronavirus belong to state and local governments and Congress?
The right-wing justices came down firmly against the federal government, using two doctrines that, if fully deployed, will destroy the modern U.S. system.
In his opinion, Gorsuch explicitly raised the concept of the “nondelegation doctrine” and the related concept of the “major questions doctrine.” The nondelegation doctrine relies on our government’s separation of powers. It says that, as its own branch of government, Congress cannot delegate regulatory authority to the executive branch, where agencies like OSHA live.
But, since Congress has, in fact, been delegating authority to the executive branch since the administration of President George Washington, those who want to reduce federal authority sometimes rely instead on the more limited major questions doctrine, which says that although Congress can delegate minor authority to administrative agencies, it cannot delegate major questions (although just how to define a major question is unclear).
A recent study by University of Southern California professor of public policy Dr. Pamela Clouser McCann and University of Michigan professor of social science Dr. Charles R. Shipan, both experts on intergovernmental delegation, found that 99% of today’s federal laws involve delegation. Unwinding them and requiring Congress to make all its own regulatory decisions would paralyze the modern government.
Those who support the idea of nondelegation argue that it guarantees government by the people rather than by an unelected bureaucracy, and this is a worthy thought. But unfortunately, it depends on the goodwill of those elected to state legislatures, and because those lawmakers also get to decide who votes in their states, that goodwill can be thin on the ground.
At heart, this is the same states’ rights argument that the U.S. has grappled with since the 1830s. Since that time, while some state legislatures have used their power to reflect the will of the people, others have limited the vote, putting a small group of people into power. Once in power, they have used the state government to promote their own interests. States’ rights advocates have consistently said that any federal interference with a state’s unfair laws is tyranny.
Since the 1930s, though, lawmakers have used the federal government to combat unfair state laws. They have regulated businesses when state lawmakers wouldn’t, protected civil rights from discriminatory state laws, and, ultimately, guaranteed the right to vote in states that kept their citizens from the polls, with the expectation that if everyone could vote, they would, indeed, create state governments that reflected the will of the majority.
The Supreme Court—which, in an ironic echo of Gorsuch’s complaints about unelected bureaucrats, is not elected—is working with today’s Republicans to dismantle this modern system, yesterday embracing the nondelegation doctrine to undercut federal regulation, even though this decision clearly will cost American lives.
Also yesterday, the court upheld a mandate from the Department of Health and Human Services requiring vaccination for healthcare workers in facilities that accept Medicare and Medicaid, both of which are funded by the federal government. It supported that mandate only by a vote of 5 to 4; four of the justices did not believe the Department of Health and Human Services has the right to require vaccines in a healthcare facility.
Meanwhile, Biden is deploying another 1000 military personnel to hospitals, which are overwhelmed with unvaccinated coronavirus patients.

submitted by thinkingstranger to HeatherCoxRichardson [link] [comments]

2022.01.17 01:01 Hansjeee 🥇Eindbaas Fap Discords • r/Eindbaas

submitted by Hansjeee to hetemeiden [link] [comments]

2022.01.17 01:01 Glass_Ad_5117 Can you still be De-anonymised by tower triangulation?

When connected to tor can you still be de-anonymised from tower triangulation?/
Connected from a phone or a laptop?
submitted by Glass_Ad_5117 to TOR [link] [comments]

2022.01.17 01:01 smartybrome Free Tutorial - Problem Solving

Free Tutorial - Problem Solving submitted by smartybrome to udemyfreebies [link] [comments]

2022.01.17 01:01 Akilli-Wonko Kedi ama Selehaddin Özdemir bakışlı

Kedi ama Selehaddin Özdemir bakışlı submitted by Akilli-Wonko to TurkishCats [link] [comments]